UMKC undergrads show off research
Jheel Mehta
Issue date: 4/28/08 Section: News
|
On April 11, UMKC hosted the SEARCH symposium, which is a celebration of undergraduate student research and creative accomplishments.
"I find it [SEARCH] very inspiring," said Sarah Linneman, sophomore political science major. "This is one program where we get to see all the academics together. I am looking forward to being a part of SEARCH in the future."
Research to many is gathering scientific data, but SEARCH contains projects ranging from science to performing arts to humanities to medicine, and many others. Undergraduate students at UMKC explore their areas of interest and work with faculty mentors before presenting their projects.
"SEARCH is a great way of getting expertise in your field of study, plus you get to work closely with the faculty member you admire, as your mentor," said Jumoke Balogun, senior in communication studies. Balogun was one of the participants for SEARCH this year, whose presentation was titled "Between Two Revolutions: A Look at Women's Liberation in Iran."
The SEARCH committee starts working with the participants a year prior to the symposium to give them and others the best of the program, said Jim Murowchick, SEARCH director. Workshops are held to help the participants with poster-making, PowerPoint presentations and how to interact with judges and meeting their expectations.
"The last month and a half before the symposium is the most hectic - getting the guest speaker, creating abstracts for the presentations, arranging food, working with the unknown events that take place and much more," Murowchick said. "But it is all worth it at the end of the year and we look forward to the upcoming year."
This year, there were a total of 51 SEARCH participants, including seven oral presentations, 18 visuals presentations (architecture displays) and 28 poster presentations, according to the SEARCH Web site, www.umkc.edu/searchsite.
Each participant was judged by a panel of four judges. Three of the four judges were specialists in the division being judged, and one peripheral judge provided lay-perspective to see if the participants could explain their research to someone who was not an expert in that field of study. One of the main judging criteria seemed to be the students' ability to explain their work.
Spring Break

Be the first to comment on this story